Regulatory changelog

What changed in EU AI regulation

A dated, sourced log of EU AI law, guidance, enforcement and case-law. We watch the law so you don't have to — every entry links to its primary source.

Coverage last updated 26 Jun 2026 · 8 changes tracked
AI Act2 Feb 2025

Prohibition (no formal case yet)

The ban on AI emotion recognition in the workplace and education applies since 2 February 2025 (Art. 5 AI Act). Enforcement is still nascent — no major formal case yet. Fines for prohibited practices are the highest in the regulation.
What to do: Confirm no system implements an Art. 5 prohibited practice; the penalty ceiling is up to EUR 35 million or 7 percent of worldwide turnover.
Source: EC / national authorities ↗ · v2 Feb 2025
ECHR / fundamental rights5 Feb 2020

SyRI (Nederlandse staat)

The SyRI welfare-fraud risk system breaches Article 8 ECHR: insufficiently transparent and not proportionate. Use prohibited.
What to do: If you run automated risk-profiling on individuals, test it against fundamental-rights safeguards (proportionality, transparency); the court struck down SyRI for lacking them.
Source: District Court of The Hague ↗ · v5 Feb 2020
GDPR1 Dec 2021

Belastingdienst

Years of unlawful and discriminatory processing of applicants' (dual) nationality for childcare benefits; nationality wrongly used as a risk indicator.
What to do: Review automated profiling for unlawful or discriminatory use of personal data; ensure necessity, proportionality and a clear lawful basis.
Source: Dutch DPA (AP) ↗ · v1 Dec 2021
GDPR3 Sep 2024

Clearview AI

Unlawful database of billions of facial images scraped from the internet for facial recognition, without a valid legal basis; processing of biometric personal data.
What to do: Do not use facial-recognition data obtained by untargeted scraping; where you process biometric data, confirm a valid basis and carry out a DPIA.
Source: Dutch DPA (AP) ↗ · v3 Sep 2024
GDPR20 Dec 2024

OpenAI (ChatGPT)

ChatGPT trained on personal data without a valid legal basis, breach of transparency duties, failure to report a data breach (March 2023) and missing age verification.
What to do: If you process personal data through a generative-AI service, verify your lawful basis, your transparency notice to users, and any age checks.
Source: Garante (IT) ↗ · v20 Dec 2024
AI Act19 Nov 2025art. 6, bijlage III

Digital Omnibus — high-risk deferral

Commission proposal (19 Nov 2025) to move the application date of the high-risk obligations (Annex III) from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027 (Annex I products to 2 August 2028). A simplification, still in the legislative process.
What to do: Plan against the proposed new application date for the Annex III high-risk obligations (2 Dec 2027) rather than the original 2026 date; no action required yet, but track the proposal.
Source: European Commission ↗ · v19 Nov 2025
AI Act10 Jul 2025art. 53, art. 55

GPAI Code of Practice

Voluntary code of practice for providers of general-purpose AI models (Art. 53/55), with three chapters: transparency, copyright and safety/security. Signatories (incl. Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, IBM) use it to demonstrate compliance; Meta did not sign.
What to do: If you build on a general-purpose AI model, obtain and keep the provider transparency and copyright information you rely on (Art. 53), and check whether your provider signed the Code.
Source: AI Office / European Commission ↗ · v10 Jul 2025
AI Act4 Feb 2025art. 5

Guidelines on prohibited AI practices

The Commission's official guidance on the prohibited practices (Art. 5): manipulation, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, untargeted facial scraping, emotion recognition at work/education, biometric categorisation and certain real-time biometric identification. Non-binding; the CJEU has the final say.
What to do: Check that none of your AI systems fall under the Art. 5 prohibitions (e.g. social scoring, untargeted facial scraping, emotion recognition at work or school); record that assessment.
Source: European Commission ↗ · v4 Feb 2025