Accountability record
How Trusq publishes, checks and corrects
Automated systems do most of the work behind Trusq: monitoring the primary EU sources, drafting, publishing and re-checking. This page records how that work is checked and corrected, with live figures, including what has not been verified yet.
Live counts from the same database that serves the updates feed. Publishing since 26 Jun 2026. Most recent entry 6 Nov 2026. Of everything detected, 92 arrived through automated monitoring rather than a person adding it, and 37 published entries have since been editorially verified against their primary source.
Hourly actuality control
Every hour, Trusq re-checks its published claims against the official sources and raises an operational alarm when a claim no longer matches. See the latest source-check timestamp and route-level evidence on What Trusq monitors, and the current service state on the status page.
What we got wrong, and fixed in public
Because changes are published before the editorial check, an error can be public until that check corrects it. Every correction is listed here, and the original URL stays the same. 4 published entries have been corrected after publication.
| Entry | What was wrong |
|---|---|
| Commission fines AliExpress €550 million for breaching the Digital Services Act | Filed under the wrong framework and described as enforcement against a member state. AliExpress is a platform, and the action falls under the DSA, not the AI Act. |
| Commission publishes Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated… | Mapped to the GPAI articles (53/55). It actually supports the Article 50(2)/(4) transparency duties. |
| Digital Omnibus — high-risk deferral | Status was stale: still recorded as pending after the act had been published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026 and entered into force. |
| Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 November 2026. — Joachim Lindenberg… | The automatic action pointed to AI systems. The ruling interprets the GDPR right of access (Articles 4(7), 15 and 23) in a supervisory authority's complaint file; it is not about AI. |