Trusq

factual analysis · traceable to primary sources

Guide

Technical documentation (Annex IV): what high-risk systems must include

Adopted 2026-06-22 ยท ≈ 2 min read ยท Dirk Baaijen

Providers of high-risk AI must draw up technical documentation following Annex IV of the AI Act. This file describes the system, design, data, performance and risk management, and forms the basis for conformity assessment. It must stay current throughout the system's lifetime.

Short answer: Anyone placing a high-risk AI system on the market must draw up technical documentation in advance that meets Annex IV of the AI Act (Article 11). That file demonstrates the system complies with all requirements and lets supervisors verify it. It must exist before deployment and stay current throughout the system's lifetime.

Why Annex IV exists

The technical documentation is the evidence behind the declaration of conformity. Without a complete file a provider cannot affix CE marking and a supervisor cannot check whether the system meets the rules. Annex IV sets out which elements the file must contain as a minimum, so that documentation is traceable and comparable. The file is therefore not an after-the-fact formality but the backbone of the conformity assessment.

What it must contain as a minimum

Annex IV lists the mandatory elements. In broad terms:

  • General description of the system: intended purpose, provider, versions, how it works and the form in which it is placed on the market.
  • Design and development: design choices, system architecture, algorithms used, and the logic behind the system.
  • Data and data governance: the training, validation and test datasets, their provenance, and the data quality measures under Article 10.
  • Monitoring, functioning and control: expected performance, accuracy metrics, and the system's limitations.
  • Risk management system: a description of the risk management system under Article 9.
  • Changes the provider makes during the lifetime, plus the list of harmonised standards applied.

Keep it current, not a one-off record

The documentation is a living file. With every meaningful change โ€” a new model version, different data, an adjusted purpose โ€” the provider must update the file. Findings from post-market monitoring must also feed back into it. Providers keep the documentation available to supervisors for at least ten years after placing on the market.

Relation to other obligations

Annex IV does not stand alone. The file references and bundles the work required by Article 9 (risk management), Article 10 (data), Article 12 (logging) and Article 13 (transparency). Tackling those obligations separately without bundling them misses the overview Annex IV is meant to provide. See the high-risk obligations overview for the full picture.

What to do

  • Start early: build the file during development, not just before market launch.
  • Follow the Annex IV structure point by point so nothing is missing at assessment.
  • Link documentation to version control: each model version gets a traceable file.
  • Assign an owner who keeps the file current after deployment.
  • Retain for at least ten years and keep it available to supervisors.

Good technical documentation is the difference between demonstrable compliance and an unprovable claim.

Sources

  1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act), Article 11 and Annex IV: content and obligation to keep technical documentation for high-risk systems.
  2. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/11/
    Article 11 AI Act: obligation to draw up the technical documentation before placing on the market and keep it up to date.

Share on LinkedIn

Read next

U

Conformity assessment and CE marking for high-risk AI: how does it work?

Before placing a high-risk AI system on the market you run a conformity assessment (Art. 43), draw up technical documentation, issue an EU declaration, affix the CE marking and register in the EU database.

W

The EU declaration of conformity under the AI Act (Article 47)

The EU declaration of conformity is the written statement by which the provider itself confirms that a high-risk AI system meets the AI Act. Article 47 sets out its content, language and retention; the provider bears full responsibility for it.

W

CE marking and notified bodies for high-risk AI

High-risk AI receives a CE marking after a successful conformity assessment. Sometimes the provider assesses itself; sometimes an independent notified body must be involved. This guide explains when each route applies and what the CE marking means.

Dirk Baaijen

About this knowledge base

Compiled and maintained by YRproject โ€” programme and project direction at the intersection of digital transformation, AI and regulation. Every factual claim is traceable to its primary source. YRproject is led by Dirk Baaijen About & method โ†’

A project or programme? Work with YRproject โ†’

The monthly briefing

AI regulation in five minutes: what changed, what is coming and what it means. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Your address is used for this only and stored on our own servers.