Trusq

factual analysis · traceable to primary sources

← All entries

AI Act readiness assessment

Map your AI systems, see which regime each falls under, where your gaps are and what your readiness score is — with a reference to the primary source. A first, factual baseline; not legal advice.

This tool gives a factual orientation based on your own answers. It is not legal advice and not a formal conformity assessment.

Based on Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), including the Digital Omnibus agreement · last reviewed 2026-06-29

What the scan gives you

Why this scan is different

1. Organisation & governance

Fill in once — this is about your organisation as a whole, separate from individual systems. It sets your governance maturity.

Do you have a current, complete overview of all AI systems in your organisation, including procured and embedded AI?The basis of all compliance: without an inventory there is no view of obligations or risks.
Is there a designated owner or role for AI governance, with a mandate and resources?Supervisors and the AI Act expect accountability to be assigned.
Is there adopted AI policy: permitted and prohibited use, risk assessment and responsibilities?Policy makes expectations and limits explicit and demonstrable.
Is there periodic reporting on AI risks at management or board level?AI accountability belongs at board level.
Is there an organisation-wide process to identify, assess and control AI risks?A repeatable process, not ad hoc per system.
Do you assess AI vendors and contracts against AI Act requirements (documentation, audit rights, incident reporting)?Your compliance leans partly on your vendors'; secure this in procurement.
Is there a process to detect, escalate and report serious AI incidents in time?High-risk systems carry a duty to report incidents to the supervisor.
Do you record decisions, assessments and evidence so you can show them to a supervisor?Demonstrability is at the heart of supervision — think of an 'evidence pack'.
Is there an ongoing programme to maintain staff AI literacy?Art. 4 calls for structural knowledge building, not a one-off session.
Do you have the interplay with the GDPR (and where relevant DORA or sectoral rules) in view?AI systems often fall under several frameworks at once.

2. Your AI systems

How it works

  1. Add your AI systems — one or several.
  2. Answer a few questions per system about your role, the use and your current state.
  3. Your summary appears immediately; the full report is delivered by email.

What the scan checks

The scan follows the structure of the EU AI Act: the prohibited practices, the high-risk regime, the rules for general-purpose AI models, the transparency obligations and the AI literacy duty. Every outcome links to the matching, source-traceable explainer in the knowledge base.

Tools to take with you

Frequently asked questions

Is this legal advice?

No. The scan gives a factual orientation based on your own answers, with references to the legal text. It is not legal advice and not a formal conformity assessment.

What does the scan cost?

Nothing. The scan and the knowledge base are freely accessible.

What happens to my answers?

Your answers stay in your browser and are not transmitted. If you leave an email address for the report, we store it on our own servers in the EU — no third parties, cookieless.

How long does it take?

A first scan of one system takes a few minutes; you can add several systems for an organisation-wide picture.

Which legislation is the scan based on?

On Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), including the amendments from the Digital Omnibus agreement of 7 May 2026.

The monthly briefing

AI regulation in five minutes: what changed, what is coming and what it means. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Your address is used for this only and stored on our own servers.