Trusq

factual analysis · traceable to primary sources

Explainer

Article 50: chatbots, deepfakes and the duty to make AI recognisable

Adopted 2026-06-12 ยท updated 2026-06-13 ยท ≈ 2 min read ยท Dirk Baaijen

The transparency obligations of Article 50 touch nearly everyone deploying AI towards the public: chatbots disclose that they are AI, synthetic content is marked machine-readably, deepfakes are labelled. The accompanying marking code of practice was published in final form on 10 June 2026.

Between the prohibitions (already applicable) and the high-risk regime (expected late 2027) sits Article 50: the transparency layer that touches nearly every organisation deploying AI towards the public. Under the Digital Omnibus agreement of 7 May 2026 this layer becomes applicable on 2 December 2026 โ€” formally, until publication in the Official Journal, the date still reads 2 August 2026 โ€” and the accompanying marking code of practice was published in final form on 10 June 2026.

The four transparency obligations

  1. Disclosing interaction with AI: whoever offers an AI system that

communicates directly with people โ€” chatbots, voice assistants โ€” ensures the user knows, or can reasonably know, that they are dealing with AI.

  1. Machine-readable marking of synthetic content: providers of

generative systems ensure that output (audio, image, video, text) is detectable as artificially generated or manipulated in a machine-readable format โ€” robust, interoperable and technically feasible.

  1. Labelling deepfakes: deployers who generate or manipulate image,

audio or video content that appears authentic disclose that the content is artificial, with a limited exception for evidently artistic and satirical expression.

  1. AI text with a public function: text published to inform the public

on matters of public interest is disclosed as AI-generated, unless there is human editorial control and responsibility.

In addition, deployers of emotion recognition and biometric categorisation systems inform the persons concerned โ€” to the extent such systems do not already fall under the Article 5 prohibitions.

The marking code of practice

What "machine-readable marking" looks like technically is being worked out in a code of practice on marking and labelling AI content, steered by the AI Office. The first draft appeared on 17 December 2025; finalisation is expected in June 2026. For providers, this code will be what the GPAI Code is for model builders: not law, but the accepted route to demonstrate compliance โ€” with watermarking, metadata and provenance techniques as the building blocks.

What this means in practice

Article 50 is deliberately light: no conformity assessment, no registration โ€” but visibility. The practical preparation is manageable: make sure every customer-facing chatbot identifies itself as AI; check whether your generative tools support marking and metadata (and switch them on); establish a labelling rule for realistic synthetic image and audio; and document editorial control for AI-assisted publications. Organisations that arrange this now are ready whether the date stays 2 August or becomes 2 December.

Sources

  1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 50 (transparency obligations for certain AI systems).
  2. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/
    Article 50 in the unofficial rendering by the Future of Life Institute.
  3. https://www.aiactblog.nl/en/digital-omnibus
    Status of the Digital Omnibus agreement, which is expected to set Article 50's date of application at 2 December 2026.
  4. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-ai-generated-content
    Commission page with the final marking code of practice (10 June 2026).

Share on LinkedIn

Read next

S

Final Code of Practice on marking AI-generated content published

On 10 June 2026 the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated content โ€” the practical instrument under the Article 50 transparency duty, which formally applies from 2 August 2026.

A

India's binding rules for synthetic content โ€” a transparency regime without an AI law

On 10 February 2026 India notified G.S.R. 120(E), amending its IT intermediary rules to create a binding regime for 'synthetically generated information'. Without an AI law, India now mandates labelling, embedded provenance metadata and platform verification via intermediary liability.

U

AI, disinformation and elections: deepfakes and the DSA

AI disinformation around elections is caught by several regimes at once: the AI Act's transparency duty for deepfakes, the DSA's risk obligations for large platforms, and existing law. No regime bans disinformation as such.

Dirk Baaijen

About this knowledge base

Compiled and maintained by YRproject โ€” programme and project direction at the intersection of digital transformation, AI and regulation. Every factual claim is traceable to its primary source. YRproject is led by Dirk Baaijen About & method โ†’

A project or programme? Work with YRproject โ†’

The monthly briefing

AI regulation in five minutes: what changed, what is coming and what it means. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Your address is used for this only and stored on our own servers.