Trusq

factual analysis · traceable to primary sources

Explainer

Emotion recognition at work: the ban that already applies

Adopted 2026-06-21 · ≈ 2 min read · Dirk Baaijen

Since 2 February 2025 the AI Act prohibits inferring emotions of workers and students with AI — think camera or voice analysis during work or job interviews. The exception for medical or safety purposes is narrow. This is what is banned and where the line lies.

Short answer: Since 2 February 2025 it is prohibited to use AI to infer the emotions of workers or students — in the workplace and in education. That hits camera analysis of facial expressions, voice analysis for stress or engagement, and "sentiment" scoring during work or job interviews. There is one narrow exception: medical or safety purposes. The ban sits in Article 5, the heaviest category of the AI Act.

What exactly is prohibited

The ban covers AI systems that infer emotions or intentions of a person in the context of work or education. Concrete examples that fall under it:

  • facial analysis during a (video) job interview to score "enthusiasm", "honesty" or "fit";
  • voice or tone analysis in a call centre to gauge staff mood;
  • cameras estimating engagement or fatigue on the work floor or in the classroom.

It is about inferring an inner state. Merely detecting a physical expression without attaching an emotion to it strictly falls outside — but the line is thin.

The narrow exception

Emotion recognition is permitted only for medical or safety purposes — for example, a system detecting a bus driver's drowsiness to prevent accidents. The exception is deliberately tight: wellbeing monitoring that in fact measures performance or productivity falls under the ban, per the Commission guidelines.

Why this is sharp for HR

Many modern recruitment and monitoring tools promise exactly what is banned: "soft skills from video", "engagement scores", "stress detection". An employer deploying such a feature breaches the AI Act's hardest provision — with the highest fine band (up to EUR 35 million or 7% of worldwide turnover). And unlike high-risk, no classification has to be established: the ban is directly enforceable.

What to do

  • Screen your recruitment and monitoring tools for emotion, sentiment or "soft skill" analysis from image or sound.
  • Switch those features off or replace the tool — even if the supplier offers them as optional.
  • Watch the proxy: "engagement" or "wellbeing" scores that in fact infer emotions are caught too.
  • In doubt? Treat it as prohibited until proven otherwise; the 4 February 2025 guidelines are the test.

Biometrics and emotion AI are the most tempting and the most risky HR applications. There is no "if done carefully" here — the rule is: don't.

Sources

  1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act): Art. 5 prohibits emotion recognition in the workplace and in education, except for medical or safety reasons.
  2. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-prohibited-artificial-intelligence-ai-practices-defined-ai-act
    Commission guidelines on the prohibited practices (4 February 2025).

Share on LinkedIn

Read next

U

Prohibited AI practices (Article 5): the hard floor that already applies

Since 2 February 2025 the AI Act bans eight categories of AI use outright — from manipulative techniques and social scoring to emotion recognition in the workplace. The fines are the highest in the regulation. Here is what is banned, for whom, and where the edges lie.

A

AI sentiment analysis of employees: the thin line to the emotion ban

AI inferring employee mood from email, chat, surveys or speech brushes against the emotion-recognition ban (Art. 5 AI Act) and the GDPR. Aggregated and anonymous is sometimes possible; individual monitoring almost never.

A

AI analysis of video interviews: is it allowed?

Video AI that scores face, voice or "personality" is high-risk under the AI Act. Inferring emotions in the workplace is in addition prohibited. Its validity is questionable and the GDPR bar is high.

Dirk Baaijen

About this knowledge base

Compiled and maintained by YRproject — programme and project direction at the intersection of digital transformation, AI and regulation. Every factual claim is traceable to its primary source. YRproject is led by Dirk Baaijen About & method →

A project or programme? Work with YRproject →

The monthly briefing

AI regulation in five minutes: what changed, what is coming and what it means. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Your address is used for this only and stored on our own servers.